Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
howard'
theres a big difference between shared services, and reg's radical plans for a unitary.
reg
paulw i think doesnt share your vision for a unitary but hope he will post in some way
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
keith
i think that the issue is one of evolution over revolution, shared services is a relatively pain free move forward in the direction of a unitary authority.
if something as big as this is rushed then total confusion would reign.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
i dont share your view
all the 2 main councils will continue to stall
just look at the costly exercise over trying to have a shared chief exec
that came to nowt
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
valid point keith, 2 top of the pay range executives remain, i hope not at the expense of lower paid officers.
these things do take time though as everyone guards their back and tries to protect their job.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
costly to us tax payers
and i understand dover picked up the tab for the failed talks
if thats correct wonder hopw much it was
and was it worth it
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
i must confess that i was left nonplussed when we were left with a double whammy aka chief executives.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
and i understand it was costly to us tax payers
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS