Guest 715- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 2,438
#1
Audere est facere.
Guest 774- Registered: 1 Oct 2012
- Posts: 498
#2
Would that put paid to the Cricket matches?
"If it ain't broke, fix it til it is."
Guest 715- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 2,438
#3
Good point, I shall oppose it on those grounds
Audere est facere.
Guest 693- Registered: 12 Nov 2009
- Posts: 1,266
#4
Got the wrong end of the stick. I thought John Goodwin had won the Euromillions there for a minute.
True friends stab you in the front.
Brian Dixon
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
#5
mad,utterly mad.to build an airport on shifting sands is disaterous.
Paul Watkins- Location: Dover
- Registered: 9 Nov 2011
- Posts: 2,226
#6
Just had my first set of local residents objections to this project.
Watty
Guest 703- Registered: 30 Jul 2010
- Posts: 2,096
#7
Do they have gills or claws?
Paul Watkins- Location: Dover
- Registered: 9 Nov 2011
- Posts: 2,226
#8
No Ray, not even the cricketers or the wrecks conservation group. I was expecting the tidal casual bait diggers but wait in anticipation.
Watty
Guest 649- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 14,118
#9
This will never happen,its a joke but should have been saved till the 1.4.13
Paul Watkins- Location: Dover
- Registered: 9 Nov 2011
- Posts: 2,226
#10
you can do the boat trips Vic.
Watty
Jan Higgins
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 5 Jul 2010
- Posts: 13,931
#11
Just one practical thought on this daft idea, where would the ships go if this joke was ever built, the Channel is not that wide.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I try to be neutral and polite but it is hard and getting even more difficult at times.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Guest 651- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 5,673
#12
It is an idea that has been around for decades and surfaces every so often just like Channel tunnels and Channel bridges
Been nice knowing you :)
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
#13
used to be maplin sands many years ago, people rushed to buy cheap property in the back of beyond thinking they would make a killing.
Guest 649- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 14,118
#14
Now building house,s out there sounds better.
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
#15
this calls for supercharlie to spearhead the "save our sands" campaign, he saved our cliffs from johnny foreigner after all.
Paul Watkins- Location: Dover
- Registered: 9 Nov 2011
- Posts: 2,226
#16
I'm worried about the cycle path. Cyclists rule supreme in transport matters.
Watty
Paul Watkins- Location: Dover
- Registered: 9 Nov 2011
- Posts: 2,226
#17
Just seen Goodwin Sands Potholers mobilising, the protest groups grow.
Watty
Guest 745- Registered: 27 Mar 2012
- Posts: 3,370
#18
If you tip enough concrete you can build anything, its haw much money to do so that's the project killer .
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
#19
i am getting the distinct impression that not all of us are taking this sufficiently serious.
Paul Watkins- Location: Dover
- Registered: 9 Nov 2011
- Posts: 2,226
#20
Seriously Howard, do they really think they can land aircraft in mid channel without effects on thru channel shipping , let alone the cross channel industry. a non starter & Boris has no control in the English Channel let alone lower parts of Thames Estuary. There are already complaints from residents about low flying traffic from Manston off the coast without night flight problems.
So treat it as joke. No doubt is could be built engineering wise but channel traffic will kill it dead. Don't see the French loving it.
Watty
