Alexander D wrote:But opposing a candidate because she is female ... sorry, Keith, that's not on!
If you his posts, Keith has made it clear many times that he was opposed to the all female selection list, not to the particular female that was chosen or the fact a female was chosen, and that's his reason for not voting or spoiling his paper.
However much you disagree with him there is a bit of logic in this, and if it related to a candidate list for a job it would almost certainly be illegal.