Captain Haddock wrote:Ray.
1. The 'row' over Braverman is almost the exact copy of the 'row' over Hillary Clinton who was cleared twice by the FBI over her use of a private email server while secretary of state.
2. Not sure what you mean by security 'forces'?
3. Most people don't give a toss.
Haddock,
1. Indeed but it has been deemed sufficiently serious in this country as to be a breach of the ministerial code - a resigning matter, which she did a week ago. But now she's back. As Hilary herself might have said - 'go figure'.
2. Forces responsible for this country's security, e.g. MI6, MI5, GCHQ. Being deliberately obtuse makes your defence seem even more partisan.
3. Really? How do you know what most people think? Ideas above your knowledge perhaps? If the current Home Secretary's appointment raised concerns amongst the security services then I expect it would (and should) concern a lot of people. The relevant point is that Sunak studiously avoided denying that they did. Why so?