• The post you are reporting:
   
  Keef, there is a huge difference in meting someone who has renounced terrorism years ago and after the Good Friday agreement, and actively supporting the IRA (as he has done with Hamas and Hezbollah, both proscribed organisations) over the years.
  
  Corbyn is an apologist for some of the most sickening groups on the planet with his weasel words where he can't bring himself to condemn actions. Even six days ago he could only bring himself to say 'the bombing campaign was completely wrong because it was taking civilian lives' with the implication that the security services were 'fair game'.
  
  As for Flabbotts 1984 interview about Northern Ireland, where she said: "Every defeat of the British state is a victory for all of us." I merely ask is this the sort of person, as potential Home Secretary who should be in charge of the Security Services? Thank God the Security Services do not come under FoI and she can't get hold of her fat file held there!
  
  McDonnell is also a fellow traveller with disgusting comments such as “The deaths of innocent civilians in IRA attacks is a real tragedy, but it was as a result of British occupation in Ireland. Because of the bravery of the IRA and people like Bobby Sands we now have a peace process.”
  
  Labour has been infiltrated by a dangerous Momentum backed fifth column supported by hoards of useful idiots hence it's manifesto being packed with what Trotsky called 'transitional demands'.
  
  It is a great shame that Labour has not swept out is own Augean Stable as they eventually had to do with Militant in the past (where you again had the cuddly Hatton fronting things up and people like Paul Taft in the background actually running the show) and would be a tragedy of epic proportions if ever the present opposition front bench got hold of the reins of power.

Report Post

Your Name

Reason