Dover.uk.com
If this post contains material that is offensive, inappropriate, illegal, or is a personal attack towards yourself, please report it using the form at the end of this page.

All reported posts will be reviewed by a moderator.
  • The post you are reporting:
     
    Currently, there are about 800 members who are eligible to take part in the work of the House of Lords. The majority are life peers. Source: http://www.parliament.uk/business/lords/whos-in-the-house-of-lords/

    Bearing in mind that the boundary review for ELECTED representatives will endeavour to reduce the 650 MPs to a mere 600, I think this ratio is all wrong.

    I don't agree with a House of Lords per se, I do agree that there needs to be a second chamber though. So, arguments for the abolition of the Lords aside, what do the forum members believe to be a better ratio?

Report Post

 
end link