howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
#1
The reds put forward a resolution that the Energy regulator would have the power to force energy suppliers to pass on price cuts, Charlie voted against it.
http://voxpoliticalonline.com/2015/01/14/who-voted-to-put-fatcat-energy-bosses-before-their-constituents-heres-the-list/Guest 698- Registered: 28 May 2010
- Posts: 8,664
#2
Ah yes, Vox Political, that totally impartial organisation. Not.
I'm an optimist. But I'm an optimist who takes my raincoat - Harold Wilson
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
#3
I don't see the plan being workable anyway, companies buy on the futures market so unless the regulator has individual dates and prices paid he/she cannot act.
Reginald Barrington
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 17 Dec 2014
- Posts: 3,261
#4
It suggest that politicians put forward these bills because they care about the constituents, which is clearly garbage. It's about choosing the right opportunities to try and embarrass the opposition, as if no labour MP would sit on the board of a multinational after retirement!!!
Arte et Marte
Guest 745- Registered: 27 Mar 2012
- Posts: 3,370
#5
Energy bills will one day see the destruction of the conservative party for selling of the energy networks.
And the labour party will have big questioned to over there time in office not dealing with this one.
People sat shivering in there home will get the voters attention eventually
Guest 745- Registered: 27 Mar 2012
- Posts: 3,370
#6
Energy bills will one day see the destruction of the conservative party for selling of the energy networks.
And the labour party will have big questioned to over there time in office not dealing with this one.
People sat shivering in there home will get the voters attention eventually
