GaryC wrote:Paul.
If BarryW is spot on, then you both have to start defending those that avoid working by finding loopholes in the benefits system.
If they are both legal and you have no morals about one, then you must defend the other.
Yes?
On one hand you have people protecting their own assets, earned by them, protecting those assets from the greedy insatiable grasp of the state. On the other hand you have people who sit on their backsides taking benefits handed out by politicians trying to buy favour. I will add, knowing the sensitivity of some, that I am not against genuine claimants but, nevertheless the State is far too generous and people need to be made to make their own provision for anything beyond a safety net.