Dover.uk.com
If this post contains material that is offensive, inappropriate, illegal, or is a personal attack towards yourself, please report it using the form at the end of this page.

All reported posts will be reviewed by a moderator.
  • The post you are reporting:
     
    Having the likes of Starbucks and their ilk in mind. I do not think they avoid tax because it is too high or misspent, but simply because they can.
    There might well be an opportunity to jump with joy that in this new world of low and flat taxation less is being avoided, but this will only be because less is required, not because everybody 'gets-it'.
    Perhaps the many here who laud the notion of paying absolutely no more than is unavoidable could explain why being asked to pay at a lower rate will make it any the less laudable to avoid wherever possible.

    Why must 'tax' be spoken of in terms of 'amount' and not in terms of obligation?

    What mind can conceive that on getting a wind-fall 20% is OK but 30% is not?

Report Post

 
end link