Dover.uk.com
If this post contains material that is offensive, inappropriate, illegal, or is a personal attack towards yourself, please report it using the form at the end of this page.

All reported posts will be reviewed by a moderator.
  • The post you are reporting:
     
    Peter, the Public Consultation was supposed to be non-political, between the DfT and the Public.
    Charlie could have made his representation to the DfT, I am convinced it was not correct of him to go also to 10 Downing Street to propose himself as a co-founder of a self-proclaimed port trust during the Public Consultation.

    Even more so as he had previously consigned a petition to 10 Downing Street asking for the Port not to be sold but to remain a State asset, as was part of his electoral campaign before being elected MP.

    Earlier this year I wrote a letter myself to 10 Downing Street asking about the Public Consultation and whether my representation was still valid, as I was concerned about political connections in a Public Consultation.
    I received a reply too, and the promise that the letter would be forwarded to the Department for Transport, which it was.

    Nothing to do with the moon being made of green cheese, mate. Just a matter of democratic principles!

Report Post

 
end link