The post you are reporting:
Peter, the command economy you mention is the present one:
The EU/capitalist system commands from the Politburo in Brussels, and has paid companies in Britain to close down and open elsewhere be it in Britain or some other EU country.
I know this having spoken to people who were laid off because of it.
Their next port of call was the job-centre.
It is sheer interference from a system that has failed and led us into our present situation. An EU subsidies based system where taxpayers money has been used to close down factories and lay people off, while the subsidies went in the pockets of the company owners.
In fact, the EU system is a symbiosis of the worst communism coupled with the worst capitalism.
Many other British factories opened up in China and India, to where whole sectors of our economy have been transferred, leaving us with millions of unemployed.
Then we have the fact that millions of jobs are given to non-British people over here in our economy's minimum wage scene.
The system you are defending, Peter, is a return to the Stone Age, I think Paleolithic.
It has failed totally, and is getting ever worse. An economic regression into poverty, illness and unemployment.
A system that, in Britain, is seeing an increase of people getting heart disease, cancer, anxiety problems, giving up sport, degenerating into eating more fast-food, and all through stress and lack of money caused by the system you are defending in your above post.
Read Sky News, today's edition, to assure yourself that the above is correct and not invented. Can't provide the link, as I don't know how it works on the Forum, but try looking up the today's Sky News headlines under: Health Suffering in Austerity Britain
with the subtitle: "Increasing numbers of people are experiencing health problems related to the country's economic decline, a GPs' survey reveals."
I don't mind if you agree with the present system, it's your business, but you do write, strangely, a list of countries in your above post that does not include China.
How come you left Communist China out of the list, to where swathes of British technology and manufacture have been transferred in return for mass unemployment over here?
Evidently, Peter, you don't want this command-destruction of our economy to be stopped and reversed, but would rather it go on.
As for your comparing my economic policies to the above, I am sure only you alone believe this!
Further more, I noticed you don't necessarily get your facts right even when you claim to be an authority: once you wrote that it is not true that Yemen is a poor country, but one where agriculture abounds and food products are exported far and wide.
I tried at the time demonstrating the contrary, but you didn't bother even replying.
A few weeks ago I read that the country is witnessing hundreds of thousands of people suffering through malnutrition. Clearly you gave a wrong picture of a country you claimed to know, while claiming that I got it all wrong and "understood nothing".
What I write has nothing to do with the economic policies of the countries you mention above, and I am sure that no-one else would believe your version either!
You invented it just so as to say some twaddle!
