Sardine wrote:Bollocks
He had spent all this week giving his evidence. He had chosen not to call his wife as a witness - as is his perogative, but it says something. He has called no other witness. He has called no character witness - presumably because the defence has been advised that there are contrary witnesses on character. He has reduced it to a he said she said case and the rest is there for all to see.
That anyone can seriously defend his behaviour is extraordinary to me. He is a disgrace.
What a charming way to start a post.
Whilst I agree so far things do not look good for Charlie we are only getting the
media reports who certainly love to sensationalise. I prefer not to judge until both sides are reported accurately, at the moment I find the accounts of the behaviour from his so called victims somewhat strange.
