Weird Granny Slater wrote:That's all as may be, B. But it doesn't begin to address the question of how 'slowing the spread' requires the imposition of wholesale economic distress and the confinement and infantilization of the healthy.
Given a decision to slow the spread, then I beg to differ - although one could have a debate on cost:benefit analysis, I accept. It's been many a year since I was reasonably familiar with
https://www.hse.gov.uk/risk/theory/alarpcheck.htm, but you can see that a price can be put upon a human life, and often rightly so.