The post you are reporting:
Well certainly things have moved on at speed since my last look in on this thread,
it looks like even on this thread thoughts are divided.
My view fits in with many others,,
Taking some of the views, I go along with PETER if the cobbled together mouse had no intention of going to war, or military action, then why go through all this recalling MP;s,
Without doubt Charlie will be damaged by his vote, but im sure as DAVID says he has his eye on promotion now or soon
but to support the MOUSE is no credible way forward as it's the people who elect you, not the mouse
And he might regret that vote come the next election.
The Mouse really went in to this recall thinking he was to win this vote, but after talking to cleggy and milly it became clear
he wasn't going to get an easy ride.
I still believe he was under the impression he was going to win the vote.
But if that was the case he wasn't listening to the many conservative MP's telling him they were unhappy.
I'm certain had he won the vote he would have moved forward much more quickly, and maybe this jolt will help us
understand and make sure we have all the facts.
Why go for this permission before we have the results of the UN who the mouse supported going in to get feedback.
Was the mouse being pushed by the USA for quicker action?
It looks like the USA are likely over the next 48 hours to take action(whatever that may be)
So whilst the mouse is seriously wounded, ED didn't come out of this much better, his amendment whilst maybe applaudable in trying to stem the tide and highlight to stop the rush,
it failed to be clear, and how it would make any difference to the original motion by the mouse.
When pressed milly wouldn't rule out military action either.
I thought CLEGGY summing up(which surprized me as the MOUSE was there) was so poor in content that the few Tories that needed to be talked round, would have made up there mind to vote against after cleggys poor summing up.
This is another story that will run and run
