The post you are reporting:
From conversations I've had, Tom was pretty much correct earlier on this thread - the original motion that DC and his cronies wanted was one that could have led directly to military intervention in alliance with the Yanks and the French and without waiting for the UN; Parliament was recalled on the basis of that, because DC had said that the government would not proceed to a new war/military action without first consulting and getting the backing of Parliament.
After meeting with Milliminor and Clegg, some of his back benchers, his ministers, etc. it must have become clear that such a course of action would not prosper, so the motion was reconstructed and watered down until Milliminor agreed to it in principal and no immediate, precipitate, military action was in prospect. This was the motion that DC and his Govt thought was inocuous enough to get cross house support and was then laid before the House and reproduced earlier in this thread.
If the announcement to recall Parliament had been held off until after the motion had actually been written, Parliament would not have been recalled. The motion, as presented, could easily have waited until Parliament was in ordinary session and I've heard a considerable number of MPs from all parties express a degree of disgruntlement that they were recalled for 'that' as they put it.