The post you are reporting:
I've watched the clip.
He is a 'politician' and a Party Man. His interpretation of events and the reasoning of those who went into the division, and the reasoning he ascribes to we, the wider public, are very much in keeping with his Party status:he won no vote, but he is not suffering as Dave is.
The video contains three edits, and therefore he is answering four unheard questions. That he is described as 'accusing PM of cavalier recklessness' is entirely the doing of the Yahoo newsroom.
He wants all the credit, and sets the public up to be satisfied with his work, something that will chime throughout the Commons, though some will spin this so that it is the 'will of the people' that is responsible and is ultimately at fault and to blame.
Elsewhere we hear that the defence secretary misspoke, and referred to Assad as Saddam, this is another symptom of the Party Political disease:these mea-culpas, that Parliament and maybe even the New Labour Party did wrong last time, and have learned their lesson. I'm not so sure this is what is behind the public distaste of what was proposed