• The post you are reporting:
   
  Quite why these two things should exhibit consistency I know not.
  
  Although the itv page that has the clip is said to have been last updated today, there is nothing in the clip to suggest that it was recorded after the votes last night.
  
  It was ever Cameron's view that evidence of CW use was enough to legally justify action, albeit that Parliamentary backing would be sought before the UK took any action. The term 'limited' was interposed as a sop for those that feared we could be seen to be taking sides, and so entering the war in Syria. To further allay these fears it was quickly decided that the substantive vote would take place later.
  I took it that yesterday's Government Motion was to establish a Prima-Facie case for them holding the view that an absence of any UN accord was not a bar to action.

Report Post

Your Name

Reason