Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
14 December 2010
19:1884603#1
Today not for the first time i tried to establish if mr dimmock was, like mr hannant before him(not yet denied) going to stand for the tories in may.
It is amusing watching people pretend they have no links/supprt for tories.
me im happy to campaign for the labour party
cant see why there is all this secrecy
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
14 December 2010
19:3384611#2
you may well be right keith, the rumour going around is that stewart has tattoos of the p.m. and chancellor, one on each buttock.
i cannot say where the tattooo of the deputy p,m. has been put, but understand that the public would find it appropriate.
Jan Higgins
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 5 Jul 2010
- Posts: 13,931
14 December 2010
21:0484655#3
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I try to be neutral and polite but it is hard and getting even more difficult at times.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
14 December 2010
21:0884658#4
havnt mentioned stewart before
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Brian Dixon
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
14 December 2010
21:4884675#5
kieth,you have a couple of times in other threads.
15 December 2010
07:5884701#6
Does it matter if Stu wants to keep it quiet? whats it to do with anyone else? so people need to concentrate on their own lifes saying no names ..........
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
15 December 2010
09:1984710#7
will take that as the two individuals who not replied will be tory candidates and thats fine, don't know why all the secrecy
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Jan Higgins- Location: Dover
- Registered: 5 Jul 2010
- Posts: 13,931
15 December 2010
09:4584714#8
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
Just copying Melissa on another thread.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I try to be neutral and polite but it is hard and getting even more difficult at times.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Guest 675- Registered: 30 Jun 2008
- Posts: 1,610
15 December 2010
09:5784718#9
Why the sad obsession with which party label can be attached to people? Why flyers filled with party and national politics at local elections? Much better to look who the candidates are and what they are going to do, within the council they are running for, for the area they hope to represent (assuming they hope to represent that area and not just act as a party spokesperson). As neither of the gentlemen mentioned is running in a current election this is just idle speculation.
Politics, it seems to me, for years, or all too long, has been concerned with right or left instead of right or wrong.
Richard Armour
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
15 December 2010
10:2884725#10
is that a yes or a no chris?
my own view is that in politics it is better to quell any rumours before they get out of hand.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
15 December 2010
14:2384753#11
howard
i no longer think these are rumours as neither has been denied
so i take it both will be taking up there tory candidates places for may and thats fine.
glad we all aware now
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 655- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,247
15 December 2010
14:2884756#12
Keith this whole thread is no more than a spot of brown stuff stirring by you.
I really cannot blame anyone for not bothering to answer it as it is completely pointless.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
15 December 2010
18:2884783#13
no barryw
the reason they dont deny is because thats where there heading and it's fine
silly to be secretive
if you want to be a conservative be proud of it
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 655- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,247
15 December 2010
18:4884792#14
I am but I also understand why some people wont rise to you s**t stirring.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
15 December 2010
18:5184793#15
barryw
simple question that with an answer would have nipped all this in the bud,
but I fully understand why some wouldn't want to admit they want to be part of the tory set up
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
15 December 2010
18:5384794#16
all part of the game barry, keith is a "grizzled veteran" of electioneering.
his questions are a lot less virulent than some of the election leaflets going around.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
15 December 2010
18:5684795#17
grizzled?? howard
plain question is it correct or not
nice you have had a leaflet howard
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 703- Registered: 30 Jul 2010
- Posts: 2,096
15 December 2010
20:0084816#18
Keith, I do think you are asking for trouble having a picture of a load of balls as your avatar
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
15 December 2010
20:0584819#19
i never spotted that ray, maybe dave and ed have something similar on theirs, would be appropriate after pmq today.
keith
i was not referring to a leaflet in this election, nothing nasty there, just pie in the sky stuff.
