Login / Register
D
o
v
e
r
.uk.com
News
Forums
Dover Forum
General Discussion Forum
Politics Forum
Archive Updates
Channel Swimming Forum
Doverforum.com: Sea News
Channel Swimming
History Archive
Calendar
Channel Traffic
If this post contains material that is offensive, inappropriate, illegal, or is a personal attack towards yourself, please report it using the form at the end of this page.
All reported posts will be reviewed by a moderator.
The post you are reporting:
Rather than us being alone in the universe (which would imply that "life" is a rare miracle and gives credibility to the idea of a "God") it's possible that life exists all over the universe (which, as Alan Moore so brilliantly put it, would mean that "life is an overrated phenomenon" and also shatters the "god illusion"). It is now accepted in serious scientific communities that life MUST exist elsewhere in the universe and there is even a numerical equation which attempts to try and estimate the number of civilisations in the universe. For those interested, it's called the Drake Equation (N= [r* x fp x ne x fl x fi x fc] L ).
Now then, my question is this: Do scientists now give this question serious consideration as part of their mission to destroy God or simply because the "religion" of science is expanding into new areas of thought?
Report Post
Your Name
Reason
end link