"Following a ten week public consultation on the future of our Household Waste Recycling Centres (HWRCs) and a subsequent Cabinet Member decision..."
This statement, coming at the beginning of the notice of changes, is rather off-putting. I am left wondering why 'subsequent' rather than 'consequent' is used. It strikes me that what is being said is:No matter what the public says one Cabinet Member will do just as they please.
The public preferred free disposal of tyres, one at a time. The result is that you can take one or even two and pay £5, I don't know what happens if you have three:pay £10, or take one home again? [I think I have discovered that it is a 'maximum' of two tyres, from the report linked to below]
Fly-tipping was, and is, a major concern. Points at (4) e & f address this issue...
https://democracy.kent.gov.uk/mgIssueHistoryHome.aspx?IId=21545
The popular desire to be able to take items away and reuse them seems to have morphed into 'wpesoutheast', linked to above at #2 and commercialised. A little sad,IMO.