The post you are reporting:
Graham, UKIP as a Party is nationwide against the sale of Dover Port, not only at local Dover and Deal level. Hence, the whole UKIP Party is behind Dover to say no to the privatisation plans, including those of Mr. Elphicke who u-turned and broke his electoral promise.
But you might find that this topic has been thrashed out on the Forum to oblivion.
Out of all fairness I will state that Mr. Elphicke's proposal is one of many being taken into consideration by the Secretary for Transport, and is not the only alternative to DHB's privatisation proposal!
If Vic is standing as candidate for the by-election showing that he is dertermined to prevent the sale of Dover Port, and has the UKIP Party nationwide behind him on this issue, then Charlie's proposal of privatisation cannot be rammed down Vic's throat. If no other candidate for the by-elections is going to defend the Port from privatisation, then Vic has shown that he holds out to the last, and did not give in on this issue. It means, then, that there is no other candidate campaigning to protect our Port from privatisation, be it that of DHB or that of Charlie!