• The post you are reporting:
   
  I do think I quoted enough to show the flavour of the proposals. As a comparison try this (and I will not post the whole of their manifesto either).
  
  BNP Manifesto 2005.
  
  3. Under present circumstances we would abide by our obligations under the 1951
  United Nations Convention on Refugees. We recognise the existence of
  legitimate international refugees from persecution and war, but point to the fact
  that international law provides that such persons must be given - and must seek refuge in the nearest safe country. So, unless a flood of refugees from a civil war in France or Denmark shows up on our shores, these refugees are simply not Britain's responsibility and have no right to refuge here.
  This is not a position of callousness: it is a principled stand that all the problems
  of the world are neither Britain's fault nor our responsibility - or even in our
  capacity - to solve. In order to further the proper handling of refugees in the
  appropriate place (not in the advanced Western societies to which they gravitate
  out of economic self-interest) we will be prepared to contribute funds to refugee
  relief programmes which respect these principles.
  4. We will reform the laws and law enforcement of the UK so that, with respect to
  refugees and illegal immigrants, there are no blind eyes turned to violations, no
  amnesties to reward law-breaking, and no extensive appeals against legal
  decisions. We will place the burden of proof upon the claimant to prove his or
  her legitimate presence in this country. We will require persons whose cases are
  pending to be held in refugee centres, not at large in the community.
  5. We will impose a permanent lifetime ban on re-entry into Britain for any reason on any person found guilty of having violated British entry or immigration laws, enforced by instant deportation.

Report Post

Your Name

Reason