The post you are reporting:
Any brief analysis of Libyan policies will show that Col. Gedaffi did just about everything to comply with western conditions, some of which were certainly noble: he long ago got rid of chemical weapons, which has been confirmed in the West (with the exception of some mustard gas stocked somewhere in the desert and which is probably decaying and beyond use).
In regards to this, assuming that Col. Gedaffi considered it better to leave it there, Mr Van Rompoy the turn-coat could have offered to have it dismantled by western military experts it in December 2010. The stuff probably was imported from the West anyway, as most other of the former chemical weapons that Col. Gedaffi once had (and Mr Saddam Hussein, for that matter).
As for supplying samtex to terrorist groups, now that goes beyond my imagination. Not even PM Cameron has accused him of doing this!
As for hind-sight, Mr Farage made his speech in the EU parliament before the bombing campaign against Libya started, so no hind-sight there.
Sky reports that Al Quaeda's second largest number of recruits in Irak are from Libya, and they are the people who Gedaffi would put in prison in Libya, and released only if they renounced violence as a means of imposing their ideas.
I tend to agree with what Saif Gedaffi has said recently, and which I wrote on the Forum previously to his statement, that it is likely that if the West bombs to power the rebels, Libya will become a nest of Al Quaeda, with bombs going off in crowded places, daily, and hatred preachers from Al Quaeda gathering support "against the hated West" and against "women not wearing burkas".
And poor British and American soldiers having to go in and patrol the streets and be shot at or blown to pieces.
Oh and incidentally, two important polls, one by YouGov., conducted Sunday last, state this: Yougov poll asks if you are in favour of military involvement in Libya against Col. Gedaffi, and 43% say yes, 36% say no.
The other poll (forgot the name now), asks if you are in favour of military involvement in Libya, without mentioning Col. Gedaffi, and about 46% say no, and 34% say yes.
That what Parliament might vote is not the same as what the people in general democratically say. The percentages are completely out of tune!
Once again a sheer example of how we are told that our democratic views do not count, but only those of Parliament, and all this while they try to ram something down our throat about bombing "democracy" to power in Libya!!!