The post you are reporting:
Funnily enough, I do see what Alex is getting at (I think); he is saying that whatever the law, or the rest of us, decide about gay marriage, he wants to retain the right to regard marriage as being purely between a man and a woman and doesn't want to be prosecuted for saying so in public. I think that is fair enough.
I have no problem at all with people holding religious beliefs and believing in Jehovah/Allah/Father Christmas or whatever, as long as they do not expect to be able to impose any of those beliefs on the rest of us. Unfortunately, religion doesn't have a very good record on that front does it?
Btw, gay marriage is not a big issue for me; but UKIP's opposition to it, now, at this moment, does tell you something about them as a party, as does their opposition to ALL foreign aid. If Peter or anyone else from UKIP wants to correct me about those policies, I'd be only too happy to find I was mistaken.
And while they are at it, a response to Keith's question about cllrs allowances would be most welcome!