howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
#1
kent gets its fair share of criticism, nice to see a success story.
there are 4700 licence dodgers in our fair county beating the combined totals of east and west sussex and surrey.
there was no further breakdown but the medway towns were the most successful in their collective evasion.
Guest 698- Registered: 28 May 2010
- Posts: 8,664
#2
How do they know?
I'm an optimist. But I'm an optimist who takes my raincoat - Harold Wilson
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
#3
one of two ways peter.
a) all shops have to inform the licencing authority of very t.v. set they sell, though anyone could collect one and give a dodgy address.
b) they must assume that every house has a t.v. so just subtract the number of licences from number of dwellings. some people watch via the internet thinking that they do not need a licence.
Guest 710- Registered: 28 Feb 2011
- Posts: 6,950
#4
This issue struck me the other day when stock traders were shown watching Dave's speech at their desks. I know that students in halls of residence are chased for their 'donations', but I am not sure how much chasing goes on in the city.
Ignorance is bliss, bliss is happiness, I am happy...to draw your attention to the possible connectivity in the foregoing.
Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
#5
more the catch and fine the better
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
