Terry Nunn
- Location: London Road, Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 4,321
#1
Why is is that young men seem to wear trousers with the crutch down near their knees and old men with the waistband up under their armpits? Shall never the twain meet?
Terry
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Jan Higgins
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 5 Jul 2010
- Posts: 13,931
#2
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I try to be neutral and polite but it is hard and getting even more difficult at times.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Guest 703- Registered: 30 Jul 2010
- Posts: 2,096
#3
Young men want to be ready for action, old men are struggling to keep them up in defiance of the overhang of their stomachs
Guest 683- Registered: 11 Feb 2009
- Posts: 1,052
#4
Terry
how do you wear yours?
Brian Dixon
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
#5
probably belt and suspenders.
[sorry terry couldnt resist,].
Terry Nunn- Location: London Road, Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 4,321
#6
On the hips with belt only!
Terry
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Guest 683- Registered: 11 Feb 2009
- Posts: 1,052
#7
Terry,
being cagey about your age then?
Guest 653- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,540
#8
It is the most ridiculous fashion though isn't it. Trousers below the bum and only covered by their Y-fronts.
Stupid I call it.
Roger
#9
Just a few words: winklepickers; DAs; drainpipes; sideburns; clogs; culottes; stilettoes; shoelace ties; The Beehive; Puffball skirts. I could go on...........I remember clearly falling off a pair of bile yellow clogs with orange daisy motif (yes, picture that without a migraine!) in the middle of Amersham High Street years ago when I was not yet old enough to know better.......
Guest 653- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,540
#10
I appreciate those various fashions, but none of those involved having trousers below the bum though, Bern - did they ?
Roger
#11
That would be telling..............
Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
#12
ROGER;
I think your to judging on this
fashions come and go.
I don't think they look that good, but everyone to there own
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 653- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,540
#13
It's not judging Keith, it's an opinion - I think they look stupid.
Roger
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
#14
i share your view roger
but probably(well know for certain)
past fashions people had same views
ie punks
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
#15
They do look silly, true. (But then so did I with my pink hair all those years ago!! But I still like pink hair. Sad!!!!) Personally, I could live without seeing their Calvin Kleins. That is not a euphomism either - although if their troosers fall any further down it might be!!
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
#16
yep bern
live and let live i say
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Brian Dixon- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
#17
the question is.is donald waring his trousers.