"Whale meat again...don't know when..."
GM technology is not a pressing concern for consumers.
"Implications for consumers
The report refers to consumer concerns regarding GM technology, stating that they "tend to fluctuate with time, and may increase particularly in response to increased media coverage." The FSA refers to its own research that tracks public attitudes, stating that it "shows
GM technology is not a pressing concern for consumers." It reiterates that the tracker has shown a steady decline in concern but notes that this "should be contextualised with consumer belief that the 'problem' had been 'dealt with' and there was therefore nothing to be concerned about".
In addition, the report states that many consumers are "unaware of the extent to which GM feed is used" and notes that there is no legal requirement to label products from animals fed on GM feed. It adds that retailers have differing stated policies regarding the use of the terms 'GM', 'non-GM' and 'GM-free'. The FSA suggests that this can lead to confusion for consumers.
The costs of maintaining non-GM supply chains are "currently absorbed by farmers and feed compounders rather than being passed on to consumers." However it adds that in the longer term these costs may result in increases in the price of products from animals for consumers.
It "may be timely to inform consumers of the issues surrounding GM and non-GM supply chains so that they have a clear understanding of current science, the status of the non-GM market being reliant on only a few exporting countries, and the steady increase in GM production." This leads to the question of who should have responsibility for informing consumers and whether this should be the role of the Government or if retailers should play a part. "
http://www.cropgen.org/article_262.htmlIgnorance is bliss, bliss is happiness, I am happy...to draw your attention to the possible connectivity in the foregoing.