The post you are reporting:
Its probably because " Im in the field " so to speak , but it reads ok to me .
1) an agreed record system of all patients , that because it is electronic would be accesable by all the partners in the 6 organizations if needed , ie your GP could see how you where , whilst you where an inpatient
2)Instead of a variety of feedback systems and ratings one system used by health and social care so a 10 out of 10 for an inpatient ward means the same as a 10 out of 10 for a socail care setting ,
3) A planned and organized sysytem to ensure newly qualified staff across each service get the skills and support they need to become the sort of ward sister / team leader you want looking after you in the future and to ensure each part of the sysytem ensures they are working to equal quality
4) this is to ensure that the gaps or the "Its not my job/ I dont know " factor of discharges and admissions from community to hospital and back dont occur with the sickening regularity that they do now. If everyone has agreed what is the role of the other and knows how to acces that support . the discharge for someone at 2 am in thier nightie with no care package and no medication should be a thing of the past
5)Training passport , as it says each organization dosnt recognnize the other ones training , this plan will mean that they have expected frequency and agreed /shared training. So if social care have just trained me on manual handling/ fire and first aid , then the NHS trust who employs me in 2 months time can take and use my record of training ( which they currently cant do )
6) Looking at the services common to each organization ie IT support , supplies , catering etc and seeing how using a greater market force or streamlined systems ( or both ) can cut costs and drive up quality , They seem to be looking a what works well in each organization , why it works well and can it be expanded across each of the organizations
Hope that helps