The post you are reporting:
The reference was clearly meant to indicate ways of bringing to the public private aspects of peoples' lives, not exactly in those literal terms of hiding under the bed, Howard. But by gathering information.
I won't put any more to it, alright, but I reiterate that there are laws concerning information, and concerning cyber attacks on the Web. If the person leading Weakilleaks has broken laws in one or more countries, or is naming people personally so as to get them into trouble for something that we would not consider illegal, but that might be so elsewhere, sorry Howard, I read an article the other day about it, then I have the right to call his doings despicable.
There are enough problems as it is in the world, I believe that governments try to do a lot to keep the peace, and there are ways of protesting in a civilised fashion.
What the gentleman has been doing is not my cup of tea. To think that he could go unchallenged by establishments in various countries for what he has leaked and could leak in the future, is naive, with the consequences it could lead to in terms of showdowns and public embarassments and ruptures of international relations. That's all.