OK, this may have more to do with plans to forge ahead with the communications data bill, the so called "snoopers charter", than it has to do with the 'Prism' issue that surfaced in the past week.
Yet both issues concern the standing of the citizen and the scope of State authority.
Hague is to make a statement on 'Prism' in the house tomorrow (Monday 10th), here he is on TV today...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/09/prism-gchq-william-hague-statement
Part of the text in the above link reads...
"The foreign secretary said GCHQ, MI5 and MI6 were overseen by the relevant secretary of state, by the interception commission and by parliament's intelligence and security committee.
"If you are a law-abiding citizen of this country going about your business and your personal life you have nothing to fear - nothing to fear about the British state or intelligence agencies listening to the contents of your phone calls or anything like that. Indeed you will never be aware of all the things those agencies are doing to stop your identify being stolen and to stop a terrorist blowing you up tomorrow."
And yet the instances when Anti-Terror legislation has been misapplied are numerous:from random searches to the sinister freezing of assets.*
*
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/apr/25/uksecurity.law