#1
It was interesting to watch the broadcast last nite Dc saying the cons should be trusted and not the libs or lab . I wonder what the lib part of the coalition thinks about this .
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
#2
wasn't aware of that mark, i managed to race across the room to hit the mute button on the remote control before dave could finish his first sentence.
not a great fan of these propaganda broadcasts.
Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
#3
no clearly election fevour is here and tories out to distant themselves from the lib dems
hoping they take the blame for there mess
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 645- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 4,463
#4
Strange that the Tories felt it necessary to distance themselves from their bedfellows.
Marek
I think therefore I am (not a Tory supporter)
Brian Dixon
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
#5
caught a glimce of the tory one last night,caught the labour one tonight.to put it bluntly it rambeled a bit.
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
#6
maybe the brokeback coalition has had a tiff?
alternatively the two parties have decided that they fight council elections seperately, the yellows nomally do better at such things than the other parties.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
#7
quite honestly lib dems been given the freedom to campaign on the A.V. to please them, the lib dems don't believe in AV it's a watered down option to what they want
the tories are 100% against A.V.
I think the tories are just trying to keep the lib dems happy by pretending A.V.
when in fact it wasn't, why have a 3rd rate option?
with elections looming tories have to now have that distance
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
#8
the established parties are defending their territory here, cannot blame them for that.
a feather in the cap of red hot ed to back the a.v. campaign.
will be interesting to see how the general public respond.
Guest 655- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,247
#9
Keith there is no Conservative 'pretending AV' as you put it.
The Conservatives only promised a referendum in the coalition agreement they did not promise to support AV.
The official position of the Conservative Party is to support the present system and to campaign against AV. DC made a speech against AV last week.
AV is an appaling system. It offers more say to the fruit cakes and extremists by allowing their votes to count more than those who support serious legitimate parties.
#10
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ GET A LIFE MARK.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
#11
barryw
could i aplologise
in the start of my post i did say the tories are 100% against AV which is thge case
and i noted my post missed words later in the post.
therwes no doubt the tories are 100% against AV
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 698- Registered: 28 May 2010
- Posts: 8,664
#12
And the labour party are divided.
I'm an optimist. But I'm an optimist who takes my raincoat - Harold Wilson
#13
Is any party in power really going to change the system which got them elected ?