The post you are reporting:
Keith, it is you who keeps using the term "force", not me.
I used the word "teach".
You are avoiding any theme that does not fit in a political pigeon-hole.
The British Flag is Christian, the British Constitution is Christian, the Oath of Coronation requires the Gospel to be defended.
And the British State by Constitution refers to the queen as the head of just about everything.
Then you go on to say that the Christian Faith should not have any special status in Britain.
You have avoided all that you see as contrary to a political agenda box, will not accept it as a valid part of discussion, and yet you still claim that the house of Windsor may not be questioned, or at least seem to be implying this.
This is not compatible with the Oath of Coronation, so why should I recognise the house of Windsor as our head, when blatantly the Christian Faith is being shunned by common British law?
Now try giving an explanation to this question, Keith, without attempting to force onto me the queen's declared superiority.
After all, she gives royal consent to all laws passed in Parliament.
So how can a law-abiding person in Britain reject that Christianity should be our Country's sole official Faith, considering the queen's apparent omnipotence in our laws and institutions, while at the same time being forced to accept the queen as head anyway?