Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
#1
tory supporter who was convicted of fraud amounting to £28.8 million in jail in Cyprus
is still being urged to pay bk the £440,000 of taxpayers dosh given to him for legal aid!!!
then we have the cosy lib dems who had a donation of £2.4million from a convicted fraudster
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 671- Registered: 4 May 2008
- Posts: 2,095
#2
Keith.
The obvious question is how did he get £440.000 legal aid in the first place?
But my question would be.
How does one case of fraud cost £440,000 and who gets this £440.000?
"My New Year's Resolution, is to try and emulate Marek's level of chilled out, thoughtfulness and humour towards other forumites and not lose my decorum"
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
#3
he actually got a £!m in legal aid to try to clear his name of the £28.8m stolen dosh
(still not cleared his name) but why should the taxpayer pay his legal aid???????
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
#4
i am guessing that this in reference to asil nadir of the polly peck empire, if so then the case would go on for ages and 440 grand in legal fees wouldn't go far.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
#5
it is howard
he claimed he was penniless when putting in for legal aid
yet was at the time staying in a mayfair flat hardly penniless
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
#6
legal aid is mainly for the rich keith.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
#7
howard
if he can afford a £20,000 a month mayfair flat then he can afford his own legal aid
it shouldn't be for rich
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS