Login / Register
D
o
v
e
r
.uk.com
News
Forums
Dover Forum
General Discussion Forum
Politics Forum
Archive Updates
Channel Swimming Forum
Doverforum.com: Sea News
Channel Swimming
History Archive
Calendar
Channel Traffic
If this post contains material that is offensive, inappropriate, illegal, or is a personal attack towards yourself, please report it using the form at the end of this page.
All reported posts will be reviewed by a moderator.
The post you are reporting:
Well, merely 'calling for the lockdown' wouldn't have had any effect on the 'spread' at all. Physical distancing 'might have possibly' had an effect, but 'might have possibly' isn't very conclusive is it? But if it were so, that rather buttresses the argument that, as infections were already falling, 'lockdown' was redundant as a public health excuse.
But, really, it's for the government (or any 'lockdown' advocate who wishes to take up the challenge) to produce the evidence to prove that 'lockdowns' work (and to define what to 'work' would mean). It has never done so, but merely repeated the assertion that they do often enough that most people are shocked that anyone should actually question the orthodoxy.
Report Post
Your Name
Reason
end link