• The post you are reporting:
   
  Philip, it has nothing to do with banning free speech or freedom of assembly that I was envisaging, but preventing court orders that ban prayers to God before a meeting.
  This would mean that any attempt to bring about a court case to prevent council members praying before a meeting has started would be flung out of the court.
  
  The prayers were not enforced. This has been established in the case mentioned in the link in post 1.
  
  I can't grasp how you manage to see prayers prior to a council meeting as being in any way associated to banning free speech or freedom of assembly.
  The problem with this court case is that it does not uphold freedom of any kind, but forbids prayers before a work session begins. It has to be overturned, as it is a basis for persecution, a basis for a stalinist type of intolerance towards freedom of Faith obtained not through Parliament but through a judge's decision. Parliament must intervene.
  
  I still cannot understand how you manage to turn this point I'm making into an attempt to ban freedom of speech and assembly. Have I written that anywhere? Please show me where, Philip.

Report Post

Your Name

Reason