Ross Miller wrote:So in an effort to rationalise routes to cut costs etc DDC & their contractors have ended up spending a pot load of extra money to carry out extra collections because of their incredibly p**s poor organisational skills and have as an added bonus hacked off a good proportion of their residents.
Cracking job all round
Definitely SNAFU
Does anyone know:-
(a) Who instigated the cost cutting exercise? Was it at the behest of DDC or Veolia?
(b) Who gave the final authorisation and based on what cost/benefit analysis?
(c) What was the intention as far as the putative cost savings were concerned? Would they be passed on to taxpayers or was there another more pressing need with DDC?
Mr. Aziz - you get paid a lot of taxpayer's money to do your job. You'll pass the buck I'm sure but the initial questions must start at your door.
I'm not holding my breath for an answer.
