howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
#1
Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
#2
soon be 90 before the pension is issued
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 661- Registered: 16 Mar 2008
- Posts: 241
#3
I was due to retire in two years now have to wait till 2017 an extra three an a half years as Iwas born after april 1953 life is a bummer.
A dog is just not for christmas save some for boxing day
Terry Nunn
- Location: London Road, Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 4,321
#4
Us war babies are happy thank you!
Terry
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Guest 658- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 660
#5
What i cant understand is that it must be cheaper to pay a pension than benefits to a yong married couple. So why raise the retirement age if anything they should lower it. Thus freeing up jobs for the youngsters with families.
beer the food of the gods
Jan Higgins
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 5 Jul 2010
- Posts: 13,931
#6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I try to be neutral and polite but it is hard and getting even more difficult at times.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Ross Miller
- Location: London Road, Dover
- Registered: 17 Sep 2008
- Posts: 3,709
#7
The reason for raising it is that the current rate of growth in tax take coupled with increasing life expectancy means the state cannot afford to pay pensions at 65. On current forecasts there is a fair chance pension ages will continue to rise over the next decade or so
"Dream as if you'll live forever. Live as if you'll die today." - James Dean
"Being deeply loved by someone gives you strength,
While loving someone deeply gives you courage" - Laozi
Guest 705- Registered: 23 Sep 2010
- Posts: 661
#8
As far as I am concerned they can put up the retirement age as much as they like- I intend to keep working.
Never give up...
