The post you are reporting:
I think at this point it would be better to question where the 400 million pounds would come from. As private investors, anyone should show transparency as to the origins of their money.
For example, Libyan assets have been frozen. Many countries in the world do not have the same idea of democracy as the West has, and it seems that any such government can be deemed ready to fall at a moment's notice.
The escalation of events in Libya should be a warning to us that we had better get the magnifying glass out and demand that the people's port trust show where the proposed borrowed 400 million pounds is supposed to come from.
If tomorrow a war broke out in China, I could envisage people claiming how "we must go in and impose democracy", even though today no-one would dream of haranguing China.
Yesterday (last month at any rate), Libya was a country trading with the West with reciprocal investments on the part of investors, with the West investing in Libyan infrastructure and Libya investing in western infrastructure.
Now it's: they are enemies!
Tomorrow, any country in the GULf region, according to this theory, could be "an undemocratic and oppressive regime". with assets being frozen.
So, again, I think at this point the p/p should first show our Country where the proposed private money is coming from, from which country, from which bank account.
Because surely, no-one believes that 400 million pounds are the personal savings of two investors living in the Deal-Sandwich area!