The post you are reporting:
I haven't taken any official steps to challenge the referendum, Peter.
As for the wording given as a reason for petitioning the referendum, it is clearly spelt on the people's port website, and was also written accordingly in the local press.
I do not consider the Town Council guilty, but believe that the decision to call for a referendum was unwise, for the reasons I have pointed out above.
The decision to call a referendum was preceded by the vote on the motion, which in turn was preceded by the petition - or request - for a motion. And that very first act, the request for a motion, is based on what I consider to be wrong information.
This input of information will then repeat itself in a pattern through the whole process of the motion (already passed), the referendum, and any consequences it may have on future decisions regards the Port of Dover.
Vic, the town wards are involved in this, and I live in the town, where-as you live in River, so I have more reason than you to state my point.
I think that, since the Town Hall meeting, the whole people's port project has come more to light through this forum and the legitimate questions and points raised on it, and the answers given, than was known prior and during the meeting.
Alone the knowledge of the 200 million pounds + 200 million pounds was not properly understood on the Forum until it was coaxed from Neil Wiggins after the meeting, through insistent questions here on the Forum.