The post you are reporting:
Neil, Dover Harbour Board was created by royal charter; royal charters have perpetual effect.
Charlie has gone and challenged the royal charter of Dover Harbour Board by setting up a trust.
A royal charter may be amended only by government approval, where-as Charlie is trying to abolish it!
His trust has no legal effect, and is void of any existence other than on his own paper!
Charlie has also tried to extinguish the public consultation process which the Government set up with the public by way of representations to the Secretary of State for Transport, and I take this very badly!
He has tried to destroy democracy by applying his own unconventional ways to impose by brute force his own trust!
He made his representation to the Secretary of State for Transport, and should have remained at that, as everyone else who made a representation diid!
Constitution and Democracy are two valid ideals I believe in and have operated within, including my representation to the Secretary of State for Transport, made and sent according to the requirements established by the Government in 2010, with ulterior comments when requested.
I would also show you the replies I received from the Secretary of State's office to prove to you that this is the case, and that I do not appreciate Charlie trying to destroy public consultation which has been fair and open to all who had a right to participate in it.
As I have already noted, the Constitution of Dover Harbour Board does not recognise Charlie's self-proclaimed trust. A royal charter may be amended by the Government, it is not known to me that it may be abolished and replaced with atrust set up by private people.
I do not believe that big people's society, which Charlie so often bandies about as a magical key-word, was meant to stamp out constitution and democracy, and public consultation.
I accepted these ideals and believe in them, and followed them.