BarryW.
You're a fine one to be damming loopholes.
A constitution has to be broad enough not to restrict its governing body, so I see no problem with including England & Wales( not sure why no Scotland) but although not strictly necessary, I do believe and I think Peter believes too, that Deal should be named.
If shareholders & stakeholders ( £10.00's) get required information and a vote on things such as, where the benefits will be distributed, then i feel it would be a true peoples port.
Not day to day running, not all financial dealings but at the very least the £10 stakeholders of Dover/Deal and surrounding neighbourhoods, should get a say and a vote in where the benefits are spent.
If this is not the case, then it should be indicated and should stop being called a Peoples Port. I my opinion.
