Login / Register
D
o
v
e
r
.uk.com
News
Forums
Dover Forum
General Discussion Forum
Politics Forum
Archive Updates
Channel Swimming Forum
Doverforum.com: Sea News
Channel Swimming
History Archive
Calendar
Channel Traffic
If this post contains material that is offensive, inappropriate, illegal, or is a personal attack towards yourself, please report it using the form at the end of this page.
All reported posts will be reviewed by a moderator.
The post you are reporting:
I think SUE clarrifies the position realy well, lthough many cabinet members may have been part of this decision(remember it was behind closed doors if i happened at all)_
As Sue says this never went officially before a cabinet meeting, nor did ANY cabinet member feel the need to CONSULT the public.
So it looks like Nigel has been left by his party cabinet members to hang out to dry.
Then we see ROGER attempting to justify it even though he admits he to wasnt consulted yet he is part of that party.
But take away the mistake that has been made, and look deeper into this cabinet system.
Are we all then happy that decisions on OUR future can be decided behind closed doors, with us having no imput what so ever?
Im sorry but this is serious stuff, and we shouldnt just sit back and accept thats how it is.
The toilets although bad enough as a decision, what else wont we be told about
we need change
Report Post
Your Name
Reason
end link