• The post you are reporting:
   
  Whilst not wishing to become part of this mud slinging exercise, I can't help but think that if the wording of the post was a little more precise there would be no reason for any misinterpretation. I have read it a couple of times and it clearly leans, although actually not saying it, to a recommendation that people should buy a share in the port. On this alone I would have to say that any reasonable-minded person, which is what civil law is about, would interpret the relevant passage in the same way.
  I cannot see how any financial authority would take much notice of it, it's hardly relevant in the big scheme of things and I think Barry that you do tend to over react at times.

Report Post

Your Name

Reason