The post you are reporting:
People in Dover District generally know that our seafront and the Castle are very well looked after, that the Castle also offers a variety of visits to areas of various historical significance within the compound, that entertainment is provided there, information gladly given by the staff...
If this is part of a drive to gather local support, it must surely backfire?
Perhaps it is part of a drive to bring a message over to a wider public nationwide, but in this case it is misleading to say the least.
Certainly not a fair way to campaign.
Would it not be fair and honest to make known to the wider public that the port traffic passing parallel to Dover's seafront is cause of distress?
The port traffic, however, is the source of DHB income, and would be likewise in a DPPT project.
Perhaps a potential buyer (DHB plan) or investor (City non-equity plan), would not want someone sounding off on this topic of port traffic?
Which of these buyers/investors would want to invest money in the construction of a tunnel along Townwall St.?
Si if the local MP is giving out different pictures of Dover to the wider public, claiming something that is definitely not the case, and hiding something else that needs addressing, then we the Dovorians are certainly at risk of becoming an expendable piece on the chess board of big-time business.
