The post you are reporting:
Perhaps the issue will appear in the Chancellor's "My Struggle".
It would come under the chapter: cutting benefits, under the heading: the depraved and their vices.
Now one of the topics that became evident during the trial was domestic abuse, and no-one would surely have the audacity to believe that domestic abuse is in connection to receiving benefits, or that it does not happen among people who work and earn a wage.
But knowledge of this fact would not further the Chancellor's struggle with the budget, so he needs scapegoats now, thus the "benefit scroungers" have become fair game.
Perhaps it will become collective guilt: "look what you have done!"
From "a history of lord Osborne":
...some who were on benefits also turned out to express their sorrow for the tragedy, but the crowd turned on them pointing a finger... and started chanting... The Chancellor looked on with a callous expression, his lips tight and sealed, self-righteous, as once sir Thomas Cromwell looked on as Queen Anne Boleyn lay at the block...
...he needed to confiscate the benefits, and distribute among the "working elite" the silver and gold plate taken from the houses of the benefit scroungers. These - it was claimed - had hoarded the nation's wealth while doing that which was abhorrent in the eyes of the working elite...
...the Chancellor could no longer borrow more money, and the BoE could no longer print any, and the Chancellor of England needed to confiscate it from those to whom by right it did not belong... the benefit scroungers who lived the life of Riley...
...these bore the stigma of a collective guilt...