• The post you are reporting:
   
  Actually it is not about saving money as IDS successfully prevented any cuts falling on his budget. A wrong decision that was, the level of benefits should be reduce by increases at less than inflation.
  
  The purpose is to make sure that only those get benefits who should get them and quite right too. I prefer a tough approach, benefits should never be an easy option and nobody should expect to be comfortable on them for life unless they are totally disabled and unable to do any kind of work at all and even then there are limits. People need to be encouraged to insure themselves against loss of income, and/or incentivise employers to do group cover and not rely on the state at all.

Report Post

Your Name

Reason