• The post you are reporting:
   
  JOHN;
  Have i at any point stated you should not give your view? in fact you are the only one from the local labour party brave enough to do so.
  
  now to get to a few facts(cant let porkies go by without comment)
  
  1; The outgoing MP was against W.O.S. until he was no longer in position but there
  you go
  2; the N.E,C. made a decision to have more women and dover could of made
  strong objections, inbstead it rolled over now thats fine but it needs to be clear
  
  3; Some members did object locally both men and women but we are where
  we are, to say the local party objected i feel is an injust statement
  
  4' The national party made it clear to me in a letter its the E.C. that make the
  decisions (not ed) so i did ask them in that case could they inform ed if enough
  people across the country form the same view ed might not get to number 10
  a he may not be aware of the compliance officers letter
  
  5; whether or not claire is a suitable candidate, and would have won in an open
  selection we will never know, and its a poor argument to suggest she would
  have, whilst it may be the case, it wasn't put to the test.

Report Post

Your Name

Reason