• The post you are reporting:
   
  Alexander, never disagreed with you that DPPT made representations that were considered in the same way as everyone else's representations. You were the one that decided that what I wrote was suggesting that you did not count and that the DPPT was the only one that did. Read back through the threads properly and you will see that I have always promoted the DPPT proposals as being what I believe to be the best way forward, never the only way. You will also see that I disagreed with much of what you were putting forwards and that I gave reasons for my disagreement founded on considerable knowledge and experience in the sector.
  
  DPPT offer, as I have said before and time and time again, has never been rejected by Government in general or by the DfT in particular. As I have said time and time again, they were unable to consider it properly until the DHB proposals had been dealt with. Now that the DHB proposals have been dealt with the DPPT is bringing its proposals up to date with all the latest numbers and projections so that the offer can be made again unencumbered by the restrictions imposed on the DfT by consideration of DHB's transfer request.
  
  With reference to one of your above posts Alexander - yes, it was made known at the time and you will note that in the final run-up to the rejection of the DHB bid, I said sooooooo many many times that DPPT could not proceed with the alternative that we offered until the DHB proposals were dealt with by the DfT.
  
  You'll understand, I am sure, if I take not one blind bit of notice of you Alexander and continue with the meetings that we have planned so that Dover obtains the benefits of ownership through communitisation of the port.

Report Post

Your Name

Reason