howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
#1
i really think this wrong of mr fawcus to get involved with this in his new role.
http://www.thisiskent.co.uk/New-role-honour/story-16493701-detail/story.htmlBrian Dixon
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
#2
ex dhb director i do belive,so it becomes biased.
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
#3
fully agree brian and not his function to take sides.
Brian Dixon- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
#4
but every little helps.
Guest 698- Registered: 28 May 2010
- Posts: 8,664
#5
Anyone who represents the Sovereign in a ceremonial role is expected to keep out of national and local politics.
I'm an optimist. But I'm an optimist who takes my raincoat - Harold Wilson
Brian Dixon- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
#6
try telling them that peter,nudge nudge,wink,wink.
Guest 716- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 4,010
#7
`Favours`are being called in....Big money brings out the Big names....and the `Bricklayers`will be active.....
Guest 698- Registered: 28 May 2010
- Posts: 8,664
#8
Surely Reg, you are not suggesting that Masonic ties are threatening to undermine Dover's interests?
I'm an optimist. But I'm an optimist who takes my raincoat - Harold Wilson
Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
#9
Well reg and i may disagree here,
having worked with bill fawcus on a number of different committee';s over the years i found him to be a genuine passionate guy.
that said in this new role i firmly believe mr fawcus has made an error of judgement in his bias towards one party or another in this latest fiasco
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
