• The post you are reporting:
   
  Well, if you were to 'impoverish the wealthy' then that would simply add to the nunber of people in poverty. But it is neither envy nor dogma (marxist or otherwise) to point to evident inequalities of wealth. It is, however, dogma to claim both that these inequalities are necessary and that they are necessary because wealth trickles down. The evidence of the experience of the last several years under the ideology that dare not speak its name is that wealth has the opposite habit of very much gushing up. But that's all really for the 'N' thread as, whatever the virtues and faults of Mr Wiggins, I don't think he can be held reponsible for the imposition of that particular dogma of inequality.

Report Post

Your Name

Reason